“School of Philosophy”
Back to Papers HomeBack to Papers of School of Philosophy
| Paper IPM / Philosophy / 18213 |
|
| Abstract: | |
|
Seyyed Mohsen Eslami and Alfred Archer have argued for what they call the cautionary account of
supererogation. According to this account, an action is supererogatory iff it involves exercising caution
in doing the right thing in cases where the agentâ??s self-interest gets into conflict with the interests of
others. They argue that further to be interesting in its own right, this account can solve some problems
that bedevil other accounts. In this note, I argue that caution cannot explain supererogation. The main
reason is that we can plausibly speak about required, forbidden, and supererogatory caution. Therefore,
caution cannot be what makes some actions supererogatory. I also show that we can think about cases
where we intuitively have supererogation without the presumed caution
Download TeX format |
|
| back to top | |
