“School of Philosophy”

Back to Papers Home
Back to Papers of School of Philosophy

Paper   IPM / Philosophy / 15362
School of Analytic Philosophy
  Title:   Quine on the Indeterminacy of Translation: A Dilemma for Davidson
  Author(s):  Ali Hossein Khani
  Status:   Published
  Journal: Dialectica
  No.:  1
  Vol.:  72
  Year:  2018
  Pages:   101-120
  Supported by:  IPM
Davidson has always been explicit in his faithful adherence to the main doctrines of Quine's philosophy of language, among which the indeterminacy of translation thesis is significant. For Quine, the indeterminacy of translation has considerable ontological consequences, construed as leading to a sceptical conclusion regarding the existence of fine-grained meaning facts. Davidson's suggested reading of Quine's indeterminacy arguments seems to be intended to block any such sceptical consequences. According to this reading, Quine's arguments at most yield the conclusion that there are always different ways of representing the facts about meaning, rather than the sceptical conclusion that there are no such facts. It is, however, puzzling how Davidson can endorse the main premises of Quine's arguments, i.e. his general physicalistic view and his thesis of the indeterminacy of translation, and yet resist the arguments' sceptical outcome. I will argue that Davidson's construal of Quine's thesis of the indeterminacy of translation is unjustified and faces a problematic dilemma.

Download TeX format
back to top
scroll left or right